|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3862
   |
Posted - 2017.02.23 21:49:33 -
[1] - Quote
Querns wrote:
If the rorqual is in the belt, it's probably sieged.
The purpose of PANIC is to allow you time to exit siege, so you can catch remote reps from escalating Force Auxiliaries.
Unless it is moving between rocks due to the super slow drone flight speed.
If this change to Panic was coming with a massive buff to Excavator speed to enable them to mine asteroids further away, it would be a lot more reasonable, but there are a lot of times where they will not be in siege for whatever reason at which point ECM will stop them using Panic.
Simply put, it's a bad mechanic and should be addressed in some other way. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3862
|
Posted - 2017.02.24 00:47:29 -
[2] - Quote
nm Kain wrote:
Thanks for clearing that up. It's still overall a 55% nerf in the last 2 months which is obsurd. 30% from the first nerf and now a 25% on this nerf. If you are static on a large roid like Spud, you can churn around 300m an hour. Now.. Take 25% off and you get only 225m3, 75,000,000 m3 less. It's totally rediculous. I'm off to sell my drones and Rorqual.
The first 'nerf' was because of a maths error somewhere in the Dev department, which resulted in Rorquals mining far more than they had announced & intended. So should be treated as a bug fix, not a nerf, since there was an unannounced buff to the initial stats of Rorquals which was then exactly cancelled. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3880
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 18:49:04 -
[3] - Quote
oresome eyes wrote:Cade Windstalker, can you please point out IN the past data on mineral price that the rorqual are have effect on the market. because i have a feeling that the minerals are going to 0.0 alliance projects and not making into the market. or if they are making into the market it is very minimal impact.
Any ore going direct into projects is ore not being bought from the markets instead.
It doesn't matter if it makes the markets or not as to if it affects the markets.
Looking at Hek for example (since I'm in range of that market), the average volume traded on Tritanium has dropped between 25% & 50%, and the price has dropped about 33%. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3880
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 19:21:48 -
[4] - Quote
Leila Pegasus wrote:
Long story short if it where the mining yield all mins would crash no its only those "Waste-materials". CCP did a good job on the first round of rebalancing the null ores so the trit pyrite bottleneck is a lot less than it was used to be but they would need to do a second round now to do something similar for mexallon.
Except for the 'small' design philosophy that all the regions are meant to be interdependent on each others resources. CCP stepping away from that philosophy over the recent years is what is causing a lot of issues.
Though I guess that's a debate for another thread, not this one.
However pointing at a bottleneck mineral and claiming 'It's not changing price, the market is fine' is very disingenuous, and shows you don't get how market forces work, since if it actually was a real bottleneck it would be climbing in price, not dropping. Which means so much is being produced that even that is entering over supply. |
|
|
| |
|